Newmarket
Mayor Tony Van Bynen is at it again. This
time he is writing in his blog about how favourable Newmarket’s latest round of
property tax increases are in comparison to the rate of inflation.
The can of
worms opened by Van Bynen is actually a very important discussion for us to
have.
The
inflation rate, generally acknowledged as the Canadian Price index (CPI), keep us
informed about the year over year increased costs of the key items that consumers
purchase.
Here is an
historic chart comparing the CPI to Newmarket Property Tax rate increases during the time that
Tony Van Bynen has been Mayor:
Year
|
Average Inflation Canada (CPI)
|
Property Tax Increase
|
2013
|
1.24%
|
3.74%
|
2012
|
0.83%
|
3.95%
|
2011
|
2.30%
|
5.89%
|
2010
|
2.35%
|
3.81%
|
2009
|
1.32%
|
4.19%
|
2008
|
1.16%
|
6.56%
|
2007
|
2.38%
|
6.39%
|
2006
|
1.67%
|
3.81%
|
I was not
able to find a source to provide Newmarket’s population growth rate for this
period of time. In one report, York
Region says that Newmarket’s population grew by 0.7% in 2010-2011. In another report, York Region says the
number of jobs in Newmarket has increased by 1.5% between 2003 and 2013. I think it is safe to say that Newmarket’s
population growth has been modest through this period.
During this
election year, Newmarket residents are questioning why Tony Van Bynen has grown
the size of local government substantially more than Newmarket’s local economy
grew and/or the town’s population has grown.
Van Bynen
has a seven year track record of overspending and voters want answers why the
Van Bynen administration has been ballooning municipal government without any
real justification.
This info may help you. Every Municipality needs a Voice to stop the bleed.
ReplyDeleteGained 7k people and it cost roughly $40-m over those 6 years. ouch.
Newmarket - Info from MMAH
http://csconramp.mah.gov.on.ca/fir/Welcome.htm
2012
Households . . . 27,918
Population . . . 86,304
Youth Population . 6,386
2006
Households . . . 24,930
Population . . . 79,300
Youth Population . 7,216
Salaries
2006
Salaries and benefits. $32,350,263
Revenue expensed sub ttl $53,325,548
2012
Salaries and benefits. $46,070,239
Revenue expensed sub ttl $93,511,338
Thanks for the headline.
ReplyDeleteNow please explain what have been driving the increases. Is it unreasonable collective agreements? Is it recent changes to municipal government reserve requirements to fund maintenance? Is it increased contributions to regional bodies, fire safety, policing? Has the cost of oil impacted on the budget? Is it interest paid on the municipal debt required to fund infrastructure requirements?
You've left me wanting more information than a shallow headline. Do you have the information or are you done investigating?
Feel free to do your own research John and we highly recommend it. You now have the link to the Municipal Affairs site where all data is uploaded to. It's all in spreadsheet's that are fairly simple to understand and the later tabs are even performance measurements.
DeleteYou shouldn't be looking for answers here. They should be coming from your elected officials. Deputize yourself and ask them for everyone's sake.