I am
writing this blog in response to questions from a reader, John Heckbert. John’s asked for more details about
why Mayor Van Bynen’s administration was taxing us so heavily during the past
two terms that Van Bynen has served as Mayor of Newmarket. The simplest answer is likely the right one: high taxes are necessary because Tony Van
Bynen has been inept managing the public purse.
Here are reasons why Tony Van Bynen has been a lousy mayor with an exceedingly long
record of fiscal mismanagement:
1) Each year that he has been mayor,
Tony Van Bynen has passed budgets that include tax increases well in excess of
the rate of annual inflation. The only
time that the annual tax increase was reasonable in comparison to the CPI was
when there was an election in that year.
2) During this same period of time most
other municipal governments, including York Region and the School Boards,
showed constraint in their tax policies.
3) The Federal and Provincial levels of
government actually implemented income tax reductions during this same period
of time to help the economy.
4) According to the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, Tony Van Bynen’s administration grew the expense
side of the Town’s budget by almost $40,000,000 or a whopping 44% while Tony
Van Bynen served as Mayor. During this
time, the Town’s population has only grown by just 8%.
5) Salaries and expenses grew by 31%
and the number of people on the “Sunshine List” grew at a staggering rate
6) The Maystar lawsuit caused the cost
of building the Magna Centre to spiral out of control.
7) The escalating costs of the Old Town
Hall which now exceed $10,000,000 well beyond original estimates
8) Sole sourced contracts were awarded
when competitive bids should have been sought.
9) Water conservation efforts had the
opposite effect than what was intended causing the cost of managing the town’s
water service to skyrocket
10) Our town library has a CEO and a
co-CEO which is ridiculous considering the small size of the library. It should have a General Manager only. I am certain that this is just the tip of the
iceberg. There are likely numerous
examples where employees are given inflated job titles and salaries and/ or
duplication exists.
11) Significant resources spent on the
business area on Main St. with very little to show for it
12) Mayor convincing council to take the
Marianneville developer to the OMB at a cost that is outrageous considering the
likelihood of success
13) Use of consultants that provided
very little benefit to taxpayers
14) Decision to give $2.7 million bailout
to the Newmarket Soccer Club with very little chance of repayment
15) He is easily distracted from
delivering the core services of the Town – such as garbage pick up or snow
removal. Recently we have seen garbage
pile up while he is tweeting about donating blood, for example, which
demonstrates he isn’t aware of what is going on around him.
16) The amalgamation of the fire
departments into Central York Fire Services has been extremely costly for
taxpayers costing us millions more than the previous Newmarket Fire Dept cost.
17) He failed to schedule responsible
maintenance of town owned facilities which resulted in unscheduled closures and
emergency repairs at the Youth Centre, the Seniors Centre, and Gorham Pool.
18) During his tenure, a significant
number of employers along Harry Walker Parkway and along Davis Drive have left
Newmarket which results in a weakened tax base and puts greater burden on
residential taxpayers. Newmarket now has a 7.7% unemployment rate where the
national average is 7%.
19) During his tenure he ensured that
Council members got their salary increases and maintained various perks despite
calls to roll back.
The fact
remains that while our taxes are going up and up year after year, the bumbling
and fumbling of the Tony Van Bynen administration continues. All of these incidents are reported and available on line. Voters will need to be informed and to make up their own minds on Tony Van Bynen’s tenure to determine if he deserves another four year term.
Thank you for giving me an opportunity to write this list. In my opinion this should serve as a good reminder to my readers as to why Newmarket needs a new mayor.
If I have missed anything from my list, I hope my readers will add via the comments section of my blog. To be fair, I wanted to list what I felt were accomplishments of Tony Van Bynen that demonstrate skillful management of public funds. Unfortunately, I could not list any. If you can, please add it to the comment section as well.
Hopefully, this will spark a good debate on whether Van Bynen deserves a third chance in October.
Not to be nitpicky, this is a great list but it is short of cold hard data, facts and figures. I believe in the individual's ability to decide what is best for themselves by giving them the information they need to make a good decision.
ReplyDeleteClarifying what I mean, let me ask a few specific questions around some of the points raised. I am searching for answers to these and the other points you have raised.
2) What other councils and/or boards have shown restraint? I was in Richmond Hill between 2001 and 2012, and trust me there were questions raised about Dave Barrow's ability to put forward a restraint budget; same goes for Scarpetti in Markham; we all know about Vaughan's trouble with their mayors between 1998 and 2006; I seem to recall some accusations in Whitchurch-Stouffville as well. I think King is the only one that hasn't had a major outcry yet but who knows. I also recall both school boards having to justify their budget increases as well. Perhaps you can put a table together showing this information across the entire region and share with everyone.
3) I talk to people every day about their budgets, and I am sad to report that the average Canadian family is giving the federal government $600 more this year in taxes than they did last year. And that is on top of other increases the year before. As well, self employed Canadians - the true backbone of this economy - are now being forced to declare more income so they can qualify for a mortgage with even more stringent qualification requirements on them. And the federal government limited their ability to invest in their businesses by restricting their borrow capability while money is at rock bottom prices. Absolutely shameful behaviour by the federal government.
Maybe you can share your data on taxation rates, because mine might just be anecdotal but I have heard it from several people.
8) I have been on both sides of single source contracts in the public space, and it is no picnic trying to get a single source contract approved. On both sides, it requires about 80 hours of prep time to get the request for a single source contract ready before you can even submit it for approval. So how many single source contracts have been approved during this council's tenure? How many contracts have been awarded in the same time frame? How do these numbers compare to other similar sized jurisdictions? Within the region? I have difficulty believing the town solicitor would sanction single source contracts without scrutiny as he probably understands the laws better than you and I.
9) Strange about the water though. Interesting that the cost per litre went up while we used less. Might indicate a heavy preponderance of fixed costs to variable. Might be worth investigating to determine the blend of costs to see if conservation is a cost effective strategy.
I look forward to seeing the results of your investigation in a future blog.