Fans of Rom-Coms will recall the famous Bullshit scene in
How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days. Matthew
McConaughey's character takes his new girlfriend, played by Kate Hudson home to
meet his parents and are surprised by calls of "Bullshit"
emanating from the backyard.
It turns out the family is playing a card game called
"Bullshit," a strategy game where players are required to bluff
and lie in order to win. If an opposing
player suspects a lie, he yells out "Bullshit" and the accused player
must then prove to all that he was being truthful.
And just like the card game, I've been calling
"Bullshit" on the Stephen Somerville/ Darryl Wolk threat allegations and
I eagerly await the moment when they will finally show their cards.
In a bizarre twist, these two accusers are now seen to be
punching well above their weight class, with new information published on line
by the Era implicating MPP Frank Klees in this sordid tale.
But are any of us willing to make the giant leap of
incredulity required to buy their story?
For instance:
1) Councillor Di Muccio is said to have threatened Stephen
Somerville's family on February 5th but we are supposed to believe the threat
was so terrifying to him, that Somerville then threw himself headlong into his campaign
including throwing himself a launch party, speaking to media, organising a campaign team, putting up a web
site, and then, after all of that, determined, because of the threat, he had to
drop out on February 19th. He was so
concerned about his family's safety that it took him two whole weeks to bow out
of the race because that is how afraid he was about this so-called threat.
2) Wolk is intentionally vague about what was actually said
in the threat. All we know is that the "threat" was
based on exposing some plotting that Wolk and Somerville were engaged in to
knock Frank Klees from his perch. In
order for the public to believe this, we need to imagine that Klees who is an
18 year veteran in this job, was either such a thin-skinned ego maniac that he
cares about this sort of thing, or he was vulnerable to a coup d'etat at the
hands of two bumbling fools like Wolk and Somerville. Personally I don't buy for a second that
Klees would waste a moment of time on some two-bit wannabes who were running
their mouths.
3) Wolk wants us to believe that Klees disclosed private details of
a meeting between the MPP and Di Muccio on February 14th. Again, I refer you to the length of time that
Klees has been in office. Would Klees
risk his reputation and legacy by divulging this meeting to the likes of Darryl
Wolk? We would have to believe that
Klees, who spearheaded the attacks on Ornge, would make such a blunder. In an earlier blog, I once challenged Klees
to reveal the name of a casino lobbyist he met with and Klees was outraged at my
suggestion that he should breach the confidentiality of his meeting. Based on my personal experience, I have no
doubt that Frank Klees knows the privacy rules of MPP meetings and he isn't
going to breach them.
If Wolk's allegations about Frank Klees are true, then let's
rename this episode, "How to Ruin a MPP's Reputation in 10
Days." I am not willing to believe
that Klees would take such a wild departure from his usual professionalism and
aplomb to slum around with gutter snipes like Wolk and Somerville. Why would he risk everything he has worked 18
years for to tarnish his legacy with the follies of Wolk and Somerville?
This is why I continue to believe that this matter is a
hoax.
And I think the Era has crossed a line by printing a story
that the paper knows is very likely false.
It is clear that by publishing this story with an extremely
low probability of the allegations being true, that the Era has displayed its
real agenda. Just like its flagship
newspaper, the Toronto Star which has waged an unrelenting war against Toronto
Mayor Rob Ford, the Era has been engaged in a similar war of words against Ward
6 Councillor Maddie Di Muccio. But where
Rob Ford has given plenty of ammunition to his critics, by smoking crack,
drinking and driving, and other bad behaviour, the same can't be said about
Councillor Di Muccio. She wants a
smaller government and lower taxes and that is against the political agenda of
the publisher and editor at the Era.
This agenda has manifested itself in this article in a
number of ways:
1) The newspaper "journalist" soft-shoes over the
fact that there is no actual evidence of a threat. No one has ever explicitly outlined the words
that Di Muccio is alleged to have said to Somerville which is the most
important part of this allegation; the words "I will kill/ maim/ injure
your kids" must be proved to show that there was a threat to Somerville's
family. On this note, the police have
not confirmed any threat nor does it seem that they intend to lay any charges. The "journalist" gives all but a
half sentence worth of ink to what the York Region Police determined. So why speak of a threat if you can't tell
us what that threat was?
2) The Era story comes on the heels of news that Newmarket
has fallen from 10th to 31st in the Money Sense Magazine Places to Live
survey. Mayor Van Bynen has hung his
re-election bid on "Top Ten" and now he looks foolish. So the timing of all of this by the Era is
definitely suspicious. This "news"
story is a deflection of what is a major pie in the face of Mayor Van Bynen
delivered by Money Sense Magazine.
I use "journalist" and "news" in
quotations because I think that is what the Era has devolved into -namely the
propaganda arm of the Van Bynen administration.
Earlier, I issued a challenge to Era via Twitter to show me a single
example where the paper ever printed a story that was even mildly critical of
Tony Van Bynen. To this point, there has
been no reply. Believe me, I've looked extensively
and I can't find any examples.
You have to believe that either Tony Van Bynen is
infallible, never making mistakes, or he runs this town like a tin-pot dictator
who boasts of polls that show his oppressed people are 100% behind him.
These exclusively positive news stories about Mayor Tony Van Bynen puts
him in the among the ranks of such beloved leaders like Kim Jung Un and Fidel
Castro.
Tell it like it is! Thank you!
ReplyDelete