Thursday 3 April 2014

Glenway is the first casualty in the battle for Newmarket

Over the past 18-months, few have been as prolific on the topic of Glenway as I have been.  I wrote 7 lengthy pieces on the issue and after having the benefit of hindsight, I was amazingly prescient regarding the outcome. 

The purpose to this blog post is not to conduct an autopsy on the issue but to remind Newmarket residents (and more importantly, voters), what we knew, when we knew it, and who should be accountable for the mistakes that have been made. 
The following is a summary of my 2013 blog postings on Glenway.   Even though you may have read these words previously, it is my hope that this will help focus the issue of development in Newmarket going forward. 

Glenway isn’t the end of development in Newmarket.  Sadly it is just the beginning and that is why the October 2014 municipal election will be a battle for the very soul of our community. 
January 2013

In January 2013, the Provincial Liberals were going through a leadership race and I was imploring the prominent Liberals on Newmarket Council and the GPA to make the Places to Grow Act an issue for potential candidates. 
Of course, the record shows that none of Newmarket-Aurora Ontario Liberals (including board members and past candidates) who currently sit on Council or who occupy a position in leadership of the GPA heeded my advice. 

Current PC candidate Jane Twinney told residents on Monday that she now had ammunition to take to Queen’s Park but that statement is akin to closing the bard door after the horse bolted.  Why didn’t Chris Emanuel, John Taylor, Christina Bisianz and others sit on their hands during a leadership race where the eventual winner would be named Premier? 
Notable Quotes

My January 2013 blog post raised a number of important issues.  Here are a few:
“the people responsible for helping to elect the bozos that created the mess that Newmarket is in have managed to infiltrate into leadership positions of the groups that are supposed to be fighting these developments.  Huh?  How is that supposed to work?”

“Maybe if enough prominent local Liberals spoke up against this legislation, the next premier of Ontario will grant a stay of execution for Newmarket and save us all the headache that is to come.”
“I felt sympathy last night for the people who were led to believe that council has some authority here.  All local authority has been usurped by the Government of Ontario.”

“Last night was just ‘for show’ because the province’s Planning Act requires it.”
“Councillor Emanuel doesn’t explain why he favours high-rises to single family homes but I think if given a choice, most of Newmarket would prefer single family homes to high rises.”

February 2013
In this article, I singled out Councillor Twinney for hinting that she supports a negotiated settlement.  I was critical of the Van Bynen-Taylor-Emanuel ‘all-or-nothing’ approach which set us on  a collision course with the OMB.  Unfortunately, as the months passed, Twinney backed away from her position and voted against mediation.  (Only Kerwin and Di Muccio supported mediation in the end). 

Notable Quotes
Here are some quotes from my February 2013 posting. 

“In my opinion, these gentlemen have squandered too many opportunities for a negotiated solution to the planned Glenway development.  Their failed tactics have put all the chips on an OMB hearing … and nobody likes our chances at that card table.”
“Councillor Jane Twinney has posted something on Twitter saying that she supports developing Glenway but wants the current plan proposed by Marianneville changed.  A reasonable position in my books.”

“Hopefully there are other Councillors like Jane Twinney willing to stand up for the character of our community.”
April 2013

This posting was critical of MPP Frank Klees, who was behaving like a johnny-come-lately to the Glenway issue.  I called it a cynical ploy for potential votes. 
Notable Quotes

“I think a survey of residents asking whether they preferred to be neighbours with a development of single family homes vs a high rise condominium development like Slessor Square, would be overwhelmingly in favour of the former.  We are a community of single family homes today.  Glenway continues that tradition but Slessor Square and the Clock Tower do not.”
“Mr. Klees can’t be allowed to walk on the Glenway scene after being silent on Slessor Square.”

May 2013
The Town of Newmarket held a meeting at the Ray Twinney Complex on May 13th.  I commented on the details of the meeting focusing on evidence that Glenway residents had been frozen out of the planning process. 

Notable Quotes
“How differently might things have gone had Council supported this motion and included residents from Glenway in the application review process?  How ironic that the Councillor whom the Shrink Slessor Square blogger deigns to reference as ‘persona non grata’ and ‘acidic’ was the only one who wanted to actually involve Glenway residents in this process?”

“Glenway Preservation Association members only need to consider the weak position that the Shrink Slessor Square group had with Council and notice the similarities in the Slessor group’s leadership with exactly the same connections to these Council members.”
October 2013

In this post, I was advising residents of Newmarket to use the Glenway issue to decide the outcome of the next election.  The facts are disturbing:  no explanations about why high rises are “good”; lack of openness and transparency; bungling negotiations with the developer; and so on. 
In one of the quotes below, I single out people who are affiliated with Yonge/ Davis car dealers as flawed candidates for council due to their interests in development.  This was written months before Ward 6 candidate, Kelly Broome Kelly announced her candidacy. 

Notable Quotes
“the Places to Grow Act can’t be used as an excuse to sell the Town of Newmarket out to the highest bidder.  We need to recognize that there are properties that should be preserved for future generations to enjoy.”

“These same council members who were once rallying to fight at the OMB are now quietly admitting that this route is a fool’s errand.  Yet council members orchestrated the events that gave the developer the right to make the OMB appeal by delaying their decision on the Marianneville plan to November 25, 2013, months after the deadline has passed.  Why?”
“I am looking to elect people who have no established alliances with special interests: including friends and family of current/past council members’ and certainly no one affiliated with any of the Yong/Davis car dealerships (who are keenly interested in selling their lands to high rise developers).”

“The reason why political parties are discouraged at the municipal level is to encourage members to reach across the table to compromise.  We’ve seen this term the brutal effects “bloc voting” can have.”
November 2013

I wrote about my disappointment that Council voted unanimously against Ruth Victor’s recommendations to negotiate with the Marianeville developer. 
Notable Quotes

“I have often heard council members speak about the need to allow Newmarket to control development, yet I have never heard any explanation why the highrise residential towers are preferred by this council.”
“It doesn’t go unnoticed that the developers who build single family homes sell out their inventories within days while lots approved for high rrise condos remain barren and desolate for a decade or longer.  Families moving to Newmarket overwhelmingly choose houses over apartment style residences.”

“Anyone who plays poker knows the differences between winning and losing is knowing when to hold ‘em and when to fold ‘em.  Glenway residents have been dealt a bad hand.  The best course of action would be to negotiate and see if you can’t get your parks, school, and reduced size for the condo tower.”

“There will be no honour in losing this high stakes game at the OMB.”

December 2013
In an article entitled Icebergs Ahead , I spoke about the disastrous December 10 Glenway pre-hearing on evidence admissibility. 

Notable Quotes
“Don’t be fooled by the attempt at positive spin around the right to argue the principle of development.  The Town of Newmarket lawyer will need a miracle to make that argument stick.”


“I don’t see a silver lining in yesterday’s meeting.  Maybe those who think they do see one were confused by the tinsel hanging with the Christmas decorations.”
“There are icebergs ahead and now is not the time for politicians like John Taylor and Chris Emanuel to downplay the significance of the evidential ruling.”

No comments:

Post a Comment