Wednesday 12 March 2014

Mayor Van Bynen is Ballooning the Size of Nwkt Government


Newmarket Mayor Tony Van Bynen is at it again.  This time he is writing in his blog about how favourable Newmarket’s latest round of property tax increases are in comparison to the rate of inflation. 
The can of worms opened by Van Bynen is actually a very important discussion for us to have. 

The inflation rate, generally acknowledged as the Canadian Price index (CPI), keep us informed about the year over year increased costs of the key items that consumers purchase. 
Here is an historic chart comparing the CPI to Newmarket Property Tax rate increases during the time that Tony Van Bynen has been Mayor:

Year
Average Inflation Canada (CPI)
Property Tax Increase
2013
1.24%
3.74%
2012
0.83%
3.95%
2011
2.30%
5.89%
2010
2.35%
3.81%
2009
1.32%
4.19%
2008
1.16%
6.56%
2007
2.38%
6.39%
2006
1.67%
3.81%

 What this chart show us is that while the cost of key consumer products have been going up incrementally, yet during Mayor Van Bynen’s tenure as Mayor of Newmarket, the cost of running the municipality has been increasing 2, 3 or 4 times the rate of inflation. 
I have highlighted in yellow the “election year” tax increases. 

I was not able to find a source to provide Newmarket’s population growth rate for this period of time.  In one report, York Region says that Newmarket’s population grew by 0.7% in 2010-2011.  In another report, York Region says the number of jobs in Newmarket has increased by 1.5% between 2003 and 2013.  I think it is safe to say that Newmarket’s population growth has been modest through this period.
During this election year, Newmarket residents are questioning why Tony Van Bynen has grown the size of local government substantially more than Newmarket’s local economy grew and/or the town’s population has grown. 

Van Bynen has a seven year track record of overspending and voters want answers why the Van Bynen administration has been ballooning municipal government without any real justification.

3 comments:

  1. This info may help you. Every Municipality needs a Voice to stop the bleed.

    Gained 7k people and it cost roughly $40-m over those 6 years. ouch.

    Newmarket - Info from MMAH

    http://csconramp.mah.gov.on.ca/fir/Welcome.htm


    2012

    Households . . . 27,918
    Population . . . 86,304
    Youth Population . 6,386

    2006

    Households . . . 24,930
    Population . . . 79,300
    Youth Population . 7,216

    Salaries

    2006

    Salaries and benefits. $32,350,263

    Revenue expensed sub ttl $53,325,548

    2012

    Salaries and benefits. $46,070,239

    Revenue expensed sub ttl $93,511,338

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the headline.

    Now please explain what have been driving the increases. Is it unreasonable collective agreements? Is it recent changes to municipal government reserve requirements to fund maintenance? Is it increased contributions to regional bodies, fire safety, policing? Has the cost of oil impacted on the budget? Is it interest paid on the municipal debt required to fund infrastructure requirements?

    You've left me wanting more information than a shallow headline. Do you have the information or are you done investigating?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Feel free to do your own research John and we highly recommend it. You now have the link to the Municipal Affairs site where all data is uploaded to. It's all in spreadsheet's that are fairly simple to understand and the later tabs are even performance measurements.

      You shouldn't be looking for answers here. They should be coming from your elected officials. Deputize yourself and ask them for everyone's sake.

      Delete